Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Author Archive
God’s Church – Are we bringing rubber and road together…
What is the role of God’s church when confronted with the real suffering of a fellow Christian?
Relieve that suffering? Don’t answer too quickly…
What if that suffering is for a reason? Let’s suppose God is teaching and growing that Christian through the suffering. But how are we to judge that and keep from interfering with His plan? Should we even attempt to?
But I don’t recall the Lord saying anything about withholding aid from others in the church. Am I missing something?
This is a very real and troubling question in my mind, right now, dealing with a very real and troubling situation… RIGHT NOW.
This Christian is in a destructive housing situation and has no way out on their own. It appears to be heavily interfering with their growth as a Christian. Add some mental illness in for good measure, and that is one sticky wicket.
One of our pastors is working with this person in a weekly counseling session; this seems way too circumspect an approach to me.
My instinct is to rush in and fix things, whatever I can, right now. Get the church elders together and figure out how we’re going to help! Can we not solve this? But I realize this urge is not always the wisest move.
Is our church too timid? Are we afraid to be bold in coming alongside this suffering, creating solutions instead of sympathy?
Or, are we going to hurt by helping? Is the circumspect approach appropriate? I’m not sold on it.
Where is the rest of my church? Why is no one else befriending this person in a tangible way during the week? Why aren’t we confronting our people, assigning people to get to know this person?!? Surely that doesn’t cost anything, and can only help.
This person is crying out for help to me – I can’t solve this alone – what can I say?
For now I guess I’ll trust the pastor’s take on it. But what if he’s WRONG?
Confused, befuddled and frustrated,
Dick Ness
The American Revolution – A Holy War?
Isn’t this country great, how we threw off the shackles of King George III to establish a government with principles inspired by God, securing God’s blessings and approval!
Is it?
I’ve been wrestling for some time with our revolution from a biblical perspective. Was it justified? Should we have rebelled in the first place?
If we look at Romans 13:1-7, maybe not. It begins:
“Everyone must submit himself to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God. Consequently, he who rebels against the authority is rebelling against what God has instituted, and those who do so will bring judgment on themselves.”
King George the III was, without a doubt, an authority. And an authority, therefore, established by God. So wasn’t our revolution a rebellion against God?
I hear the objection (and I’ve said it myself), “But the king was a tyrant!”
If we accept that he was a tyrant, does that justify our rebellion? There were tyrannical Roman emperors, weren’t there? Paul and Peter were martyred under Nero’s reign, a well known tyrant.
And wasn’t there taxation without representation in the Roman empire? Is that enough of a reason to revolt?
In 1 Peter 2:13-14, we have a little different take on authority:
“Submit yourselves for the Lord’s sake to every authority instituted among men: whether to the king, as the supreme authority, or to governors, who are sent by him to punish those who do wrong and to commend those who do right.”
Interesting, isn’t it? A distinction is made about governors and their role as an agent of justice. But no mention is made of how to address an unjust governor.
Can anyone point me to a passage that proscribes our actions when governed unjustly?
The closest I can get is instruction on how to deal with taxation without representation:
Matthew 22:15-22 (New International Version)
Then the Pharisees went out and laid plans to trap him in his words. They sent their disciples to him along with the Herodians. “Teacher,” they said, “we know you are a man of integrity and that you teach the way of God in accordance with the truth. You aren’t swayed by men, because you pay no attention to who they are. Tell us then, what is your opinion? Is it right to pay taxes to Caesar or not?”
But Jesus, knowing their evil intent, said, “You hypocrites, why are you trying to trap me? Show me the coin used for paying the tax.” They brought him a denarius, and he asked them, “Whose portrait is this? And whose inscription?”
“Caesar’s,” they replied. Then he said to them, “Give to Caesar what is Caesar’s, and to God what is God’s.”
When they heard this, they were amazed. So they left him and went away.
But Jesus, knowing their evil intent, said, “You hypocrites, why are you trying to trap me? Show me the coin used for paying the tax.” They brought him a denarius, and he asked them, “Whose portrait is this? And whose inscription?”
“Caesar’s,” they replied. Then he said to them, “Give to Caesar what is Caesar’s, and to God what is God’s.”
When they heard this, they were amazed. So they left him and went away.
So, no call to rebellion there at all, is there? Quite the opposite.
Why are we special? Are we special?
Why does God’s word seemingly not apply to our nation?
At what point do we transcend rebellion and enter a state of being established by God?
p.s. And I didn’t even go near the hyperbole that Hitler and the holocaust would’ve introduced. I find it more interesting to explore the grey.